Aira is being built around consultation memory, but memory is useful only when people can trust how it was created. That is why our first milestone is a controlled clinical pilot, not a broad product launch.
Start with the real workflow
The pilot begins before the recording button is pressed. A participating clinic needs a clear way to explain recording, confirm consent, handle a refusal, assign access, and respond when something goes wrong.
During a consultation, the product should communicate its state without asking the doctor to manage another complicated screen. After the visit, the doctor needs to understand what the system produced, correct it, and decide whether it is ready to approve.
Measure more than speed
Time matters, but it is not the only question. We also want to understand whether patients receive a clear explanation, whether the recorder fits naturally in the room, how much correction the draft needs, and whether approved context is useful when a patient returns.
Qualitative feedback matters here. A workflow can look efficient in a dashboard and still feel distracting or unclear to the people using it.
Keep claims behind evidence
The website describes intended capabilities and marks product imagery as concept work. We will separate those intentions from results measured in Aira's own pilot.
Health-related educational articles will remain unpublished until they have a named clinical reviewer, a review date, and appropriate sources. The same principle applies to product claims. We want the evidence to arrive before the headline.
What happens next
We are inviting qualified doctors and clinic teams in Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Mumbai, and Coimbatore to apply. People in other cities can join the future-access list.
Pilot selection will consider workflow fit, willingness to provide structured feedback, and readiness to use an agreed consent and review process. Applying is the start of a conversation, not a promise of selection.